dormouse1953: (Default)
dormouse1953 ([personal profile] dormouse1953) wrote2017-12-05 01:19 pm
Entry tags:

Today's Guardian

Today's Guardian has an obituary of Geoff Tootill, one of the creators of the "Baby" computer in Manchester in 1948. It claims that the computer took 52 minutes to calculate the highest factor of 2^18. I know computers were slow in those days, but...

Curiously, I remember seeing a similar error on the 50th anniversary of this computer. We used to have a computing department house magazine at work and someone wrote about this computer and said it took some length of time to determine if 2^32-1 was prime. Well, I think it was divisible by 3.

UPDATE

The Guardian contacted me last night to ask if I had a reference as to why I thought 2^18 was wrong. They pointed me to several sites referencing this number:

http://curation.cs.manchester.ac.uk/computer50/www.computer50.org/mark1/new.baby.html

So, did they use 2^18 as a test, because it was trivial to find the correct answer - 131072 - and write a brute force program just dividing by larger and larger numbers to see what the largest factor was?

It occurs to me that the first computer I ever programmed had 18 bit words and couldn't handle integers of 2^18 and larger.

[identity profile] vicarage.livejournal.com 2017-12-09 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)
do you have a dreamwidth account Paul? You are about the last person I only see here.

[identity profile] pauldormer.livejournal.com 2017-12-09 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)
This was posted on Dreamwidth. dormouse1953. I'm sure my posts used to say there were crossposted, but it seems to have stopped doing that.

[identity profile] vicarage.livejournal.com 2017-12-09 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
added you there and given you permission. I'm vicarage there

Ta

J

[identity profile] pauldormer.livejournal.com 2017-12-09 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
In fact, I see you responded to my post on Dreamwidth on June 1st this year when I announced my new account.